(0172) 2792754, (0172) 2790312 principal.sggs26@gmail.com
Prospectus 2025-26 New Admission
Admission Helpline:
84377 66329 98157 55859 85569 28121 95921 16722

Feedback Analysis & Action Taken Report

A continuous-improvement loop driven by every stakeholder of the College

Home › Academics › Feedback & ATR
Internal Quality Assurance Cell · IQAC

Listening, analysing & acting — every academic year

The Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) of Sri Guru Gobind Singh College systematically collects feedback from students, teaching faculty, parents, alumni and employers on the curriculum, teaching, infrastructure, administration and overall student experience.

This feedback is consolidated, analysed and translated into a formal Action Taken Report (ATR) each academic year — closing the quality loop that informs curriculum updates, infrastructure improvements, faculty development, student welfare initiatives and administrative reforms.

6
Stakeholder
Feedback Forms
8
Years of
Action Taken Reports
2016 → 2024
A continuous, transparent record of institutional self-assessment

Feedback Forms · By Stakeholder Group

The College administers six standardised feedback instruments — each tailored to a specific stakeholder group and covering distinct dimensions of institutional quality. Click any card below to view or download the form (PDF):

📚
Students

Student Feedback Form

Curriculum, Teaching, Learning & Evaluation

Eligibility · Open to students with at least 65% attendance · anonymous Rating Scale · Excellent (5) · Very Good (4) · Good (3) · Satisfactory (2) · Poor (1)

Areas Assessed

Courses, Syllabi & Subject Evaluation

  • Course organisation
  • Syllabus coverage
  • Stress on concept building
  • Thrust on application of concepts learnt
  • Content coverage — from zero level to advanced
  • Availability of relevant and prescribed books, notes and study material
  • Practice through assignments
  • Evaluation via tests and viva-voce
  • Concept clarity and skills developed
  • Overall rating of the course

Teacher

  • Completes the entire syllabus in time
  • Has subject knowledge
  • Communicates clearly and inspires through teaching
  • Comes well prepared in the class
  • Encourages participation and discussion in the class
  • Uses teaching aids, handouts, references and conducts seminars/tutorials
  • Friendly & helpful attitude towards students
  • Evaluation process is fair and unbiased
  • Available and accessible in the department
🏛️
Students

Student Feedback Form

Infrastructure, Administration & Collaborations

Eligibility · Open to students with at least 65% attendance · anonymous Rating Scale · Excellent (5) · Very Good (4) · Good (3) · Satisfactory (2) · Poor (1)

Areas Assessed

Institution Infrastructure

  • Laboratories — subject-specific (Basic Sciences & Computer Science)
  • Basic amenities — drinking water and sanitation
  • Medical Room
  • Girls’ Common Room
  • Hostel
  • Canteen and Mess

Administration

  • Placement Guidance and Career Counselling Cell
  • Grievance Redressal Cell
  • Anti-Ragging Cell
  • Office Administration and student interaction
  • Student Council Association
  • Hostel Administration
  • Anti Sexual Harassment Cell

For Foreign Students Only

  • Level of support at the time of admission
  • Study environment
  • Cultural experiences
  • Overall experience
👨‍🏫
Teaching Faculty

Faculty Feedback Form

Academic environment & institutional support

Eligibility · Open to all teaching faculty members · name optional Rating Scale · Strongly Agree · Agree · Neutral · Disagree · Strongly Disagree

Areas Assessed

Recognition & Workplace

  • The merit of teachers is recognised
  • The work distribution among staff is fair
  • Regular meetings are held for smooth and effective functioning
  • The administration is teacher-friendly
  • The environment is conducive to teaching and research

Curriculum & Resources

  • The system for implementation of curriculum is effective
  • Course content is covered by corresponding reference material
  • Sufficient prescribed books are available in the Library
  • Sufficient time is available to conduct examinations covering all units
  • Freedom to adopt/adapt new techniques of testing and assessment

Infrastructure

  • Canteen, sitting area, research lab, Wi-Fi etc. are available
👪
Parents

Parents’ Feedback Form

Ward’s experience & institutional engagement

Eligibility · Open to parents/guardians of currently enrolled students Rating Scale · Yes · No (with open-ended suggestions)

Areas Assessed

Institutional Quality

  • Do you find this college better than others for your ward?
  • Do you feel facilities in the college are adequate?
  • Is your ward physically secure on the college campus?
  • Are you satisfied about hostel facilities?

Communication & Support

  • Are you satisfied with cooperation from the administrative staff?
  • Can you make direct communication with teaching staff?

Outcomes

  • Do you find up-gradation of hard and soft skills?
  • Is your ward given enough exposure as far as career orientation is concerned?
🎓
Alumni

Alumni Feedback Form

Looking back · institutional pride & outcomes

Eligibility · Open to all alumni of the College Rating Scale · Agree · Sometimes · Disagree (with open-ended suggestions)

Areas Assessed

Pride & Recommendation

  • Do you feel proud to be associated with SGGSC as an Alumni?
  • Would you recommend the College to your near and dear ones for academic and overall excellence?

Academic & Infrastructure

  • College is having adequate infrastructure for academics and extra-curricular activities
  • College is having adequate laboratories and equipment for practical experiences
  • You obtained sufficient knowledge (theory and practical) at SGGS College
  • Teachers were effective in solving your problems

Student Life & Outcomes

  • College organises various kinds of activities for overall development
  • Institute handles student grievances properly
  • Training and Placement Cell provided ample on/off-campus opportunities
  • College provides good hospitality as alumni after passing out
🏢
Employers

Employer’s Feedback Form

Workplace performance of our graduates

Eligibility · Open to employers of SGGS graduates Rating Scale · Yes · No (with open-ended comments)

Areas Assessed

Knowledge & Skills

  • Good technical knowledge in the area of work
  • Curriculum has provided sufficient knowledge in the area of work
  • General communication skills
  • Using technology and equipment at the workplace

Teamwork & Initiative

  • Working as part of a team
  • Creative in response to workplace challenges
  • Self-motivated and taking an appropriate level of responsibility
  • Innovativeness, creativeness and openness to new ideas

Workplace Conduct

  • Ability to manage and have leadership qualities
  • Maintains relationship with seniors / peers / subordinates

Open Feedback

  • Areas of dissatisfaction (open response)
  • Suggestions for programme & curriculum improvement (open response)
🔒
Confidentiality assurance — The student feedback forms are anonymous (no name or roll number is recorded). All responses are treated as confidential and used solely for student participation in quality enhancement.

Action Taken Reports · Year by Year

The full archive of Feedback Analysis & Action Taken Reports — eight consecutive academic years of consolidated stakeholder feedback and the institutional response to it. Click any year to download the corresponding report.

Latest
2023-24
Feedback Analysis & ATR
PDF 3.5 MB
Download
2022-23
Feedback Analysis & ATR
PDF 4.2 MB
Download
2021-22
Feedback Analysis & ATR
PDF 1.1 MB
Download
2020-21
Feedback Analysis & ATR
PDF 4.4 MB
Download
2019-20
Feedback Analysis & ATR
PDF 1.8 MB
Download
2018-19
Feedback Analysis & ATR
PDF 1.9 MB
Download
2017-18
Feedback Analysis & ATR
PDF 1.8 MB
Download
2016-17
Feedback Analysis & ATR
PDF 1.4 MB
Download

The Feedback & Action Cycle

The institutional quality loop is implemented through a five-stage process — repeated every academic year by the Internal Quality Assurance Cell:

1

Collect

Standardised feedback forms are administered to students, faculty, parents, alumni and employers — typically at the close of an academic session or graduation.

2

Consolidate

Responses are aggregated by stakeholder group and by department, with anonymity preserved for student feedback as a matter of institutional policy.

3

Analyse

The IQAC analyses trends, satisfaction patterns and qualitative suggestions — identifying both areas of strength and specific opportunities for improvement.

4

Act

Actionable findings are translated into specific institutional measures — curricular updates, infrastructure investments, training programmes, administrative reforms.

5

Report

The findings and the responses to them are published as the Action Taken Report (ATR) each year — a transparent, public-facing record of how feedback shaped institutional action.